We design, implement and operate AI workflows and agents for practices, organisations and regulated institutions, with approval before every commitment and a record of every action.
Average time on short professional writing tasks fell 40% when participants used ChatGPT, and evaluator-graded quality rose 18%.
453 college-educated professionals (marketers, grant writers, consultants, data analysts, HR professionals and managers) in a preregistered online experiment; half were randomly given ChatGPT. The tasks were paid, occupation-specific writing assignments of 20 to 30 minutes: press releases, short reports, analysis plans and delicate emails.
Short, self-contained tasks in an experiment, without context-specific knowledge; the authors say this may inflate the estimates. Quality was graded by evaluators.
Customer-support agents with a generative AI assistant resolved 15% more issues per hour on average; less experienced and lower-skilled agents improved in both speed and quality.
5,172 customer-support agents at one firm, a Fortune 500 company that sells business-process software. The assistant was introduced in stages, not in a randomised trial. Task: customer-support chat, measured as issues resolved per hour.
The most experienced and highest-skilled agents saw small gains in speed and small declines in quality. The authors say the findings apply to one AI tool, used in one firm, in one occupation.
Consultants using GPT-4 on tasks inside the AI's capability finished 25.1% more quickly, completed 12.2% more tasks, and produced work rated more than 40% higher in quality than a control group.
758 Boston Consulting Group consultants in total, in a preregistered experiment, randomly assigned to no AI, GPT-4, or GPT-4 with a prompt-engineering overview. These figures come from the 385 who worked on 18 realistic consulting tasks inside the AI's capability, such as developing new product ideas.
The gains held only for tasks inside the AI's capability. On a task outside it, consultants using AI were less likely to be correct (E3b). One firm, GPT-4 as it was in 2023, and a working paper.
Experienced open-source developers took 19% longer to complete tasks when AI was allowed, though they estimated afterwards that AI had cut their completion time by 20%.
16 experienced developers, with about five years on their projects, working 246 real issues in their own mature repositories; each issue was randomly assigned to AI allowed or not allowed. The main tools were Cursor Pro with Claude 3.5 and 3.7 Sonnet, February to June 2025.
Early-2025 tools, and expert users on familiar, complex work. METR says the result does not show that AI fails to speed up most developers. In February 2026 METR gave the 95% confidence interval as 2% to 39% slower, said developers are likely more sped up now, and said its newer data give an unreliable signal because developers opted out of working without AI.
Every solution, workflow and implementation is assembled from the same deposited frameworks, and each page says which parts it uses and what you keep at the end.
01
Discover
One repeated task: its owner, how often, the data it touches, the time it takes today.
02
Design
Boundaries and approvals named before anything is built, with what must never happen written down.
03
Implement
Built and tested against fictional, ambiguous, duplicate and adversarial cases before it reaches you.
04
Operate
An owner, a review date and an off switch. Measured against the baseline, retired when unused.
Short answers about how iSystematic works, what it builds and what an engagement looks like.
What does iSystematic do?
iSystematic is an applied-AI studio. It builds and operates agentic systems and automations for organisations, runs an enterprise practice in AI governance and readiness, implements ARIA by Simplification.io for customer conversations, and sets up workflows for practices and firms in their own AI assistants.
Who does iSystematic work with?
iSystematic works with thirteen kinds of customer in three groups: practices and firms (clinics, law firms, accounting firms, property management, service businesses and independent professionals), organisations (operations, customer service, engineering, compliance and procurement, and municipalities) and regulated institutions (Canadian financial institutions and GCC institutions). Each has its own page with one recommended way to start.
Who founded iSystematic?
iSystematic Inc. was founded by Nabeel Khan in 2013, in Canada. Nabeel Khan is a Defensible AI Architect, working in enterprise AI architecture and AI governance for regulated institutions. He leads iSystematic's enterprise practice and is the author of the books and deposited specifications the work is built on.
Does Nabeel Khan work on engagements personally?
On enterprise engagements, yes. iSystematic is a studio with a team of builders, and build work is delivered by that team. iSystematic's enterprise practice, covering AI governance and readiness, enterprise AI architecture and advisory, is led by Nabeel Khan personally, and those engagements are scoped that way from the start.
Where is iSystematic based?
iSystematic Inc. is a Canadian company. iSystematic works with clients across Canada, the United States and internationally, and operates as a distributed team rather than from a single office.
Does iSystematic build on Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity or Grok?
iSystematic's workflows run standalone in the customer's own Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity or Grok account, where the workflow has been verified on that platform; iSystematic does not resell them. Work for organisations is model-agnostic.
Do iSystematic's workflows send emails or book appointments on their own?
Not by default. Every iSystematic workflow prepares, and a person approves before anything is sent, booked, paid, published or changed.
Is my clinic's or firm's client data used?
iSystematic's intake never asks for patient records, client files, identity documents or passwords. Workflows that touch confidential data are designed with the least access needed and run in accounts the customer controls.
How much does iSystematic charge?
iSystematic's workflow cards are free. Setup is priced on a short call until the first packs are released, and prices are published then. Work for organisations and the enterprise practice is scoped on a call.
Are the numbers on this site iSystematic's results?
No. The figures on this site come from published studies, each linked to its source. iSystematic's own results will be published only from documented pilots.
How do I get in touch with iSystematic?
Use the contact form on this site. iSystematic responds to inquiries within one business day, Monday to Friday.
Contact
Tell us about one task.
One repeated task is enough to start. We reply within one business day, and the form tells you the next step that usually fits.